Winners

Congrats to:

TQL, MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke, QuantumLoop Teams as top three teams!

First Place
Member: Hanrui Wang, Pengyu Liu, Pingzhi Li, Junyao Zhang, Shreya Chaudhary, Tianlong Chen, Yiran Chen, Fred Chong, Song Han

Team ID: MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke
Team Affiliation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, Duke University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Chicago

Second Place
Member: Weitang Li

Team ID: TQL
Team Affiliation: Tecent Quantum Lab

Third Place
Member: Jialin Chen, Ke Xu, Di Wu, Jin Li, Jiaoyun Jin, Zhiqiang Cai

Team ID: QuantumLoop
Team Affiliation: Fudan University

Please accept our heartiest congratulations!!

-->

EPiQC Team has been selected to win the Innovation Award! We will release the detail of the technique the team implemented soon!

You can also view the following table to get detailed team scores for top 20 teams, if your team name not listed in the top 20 teams, please feel free to contact for the detail score for your team:

-->
Rank Team name Final Score Accuracy QRC Reflection
1 MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke 149.393 99.893 40 9.5
2 TQL 148.93 99.93 39 10
3 QuantumLoop 147.832 99.732 39.6 8.5
4 Quantum Korea 147.36 99.96 39.4 8
5 Coastal Alliance 146.48 98.08 39.9 8.5
6 Positive Technology Lab 145.77 98.07 39.2 8.5
7 originqc 143.87 98.4 37.97 7.5
8 ZJU_CS_QuLab 141.418 96.218 36.2 9
9 ALCom Quantum Boys & Girls 141.405 95.605 39.8 6
10 longyingzhandui 141.25 97.4 38.6 5.25
11 HaveATry 139.65 98.05 35.6 6
12 underwater (Second Place Performance in terms of Accuracy) 137.232 99.932 29.8 7.5
13 Quantumhan 135.28 98.73 28.3 8.25
14 MediQal 133.18 97.88 28.8 6.5
15 QemSpin 133.114 98.814 26.8 7.5
16 GXU-LIPE 132.434 97.484 27.7 7.25
17 Excited state 131.32 97.17 25.9 8.25
18 QwQ 127.45 94.35 27.1 6
19 Force be with you 103.5 less 60 36.5 7
20 KSU-Guans-Quantum 60 less 60 - -

This is the top5 team ranking based on the Accuracy metric.

Rank Team name Final Score Accuracy QRC Reflection
1 Quantum Korea 147.36 99.96 39.4 8
2 underwater 137.232 99.932 29.8 7.5
3 TQL hidden hidden hidden hidden
4 MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke hidden hidden hidden hidden
5 QemSpin 133.114 98.814 26.8 7.5

This is the top5 team ranking based on the Quantum Resource Cost metric.

Rank Team name Final Score Accuracy QRC Reflection
1 MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke hidden hidden hidden hidden
2 Coastal Alliance 146.48 98.08 39.9 8.5
3 ALCom Quantum Boys & Girls 141.405 95.605 39.8 6
4 QuantumLoop hidden hidden hidden hidden
5 Quantum Korea 147.36 99.96 39.4 8

This is the top5 team ranking based on the Self Reflection metric.

Rank Team name Final Score Accuracy QRC Reflection
1 EPiQC NA NA NA 10
1 TQL hidden hidden hidden hidden
3 MIT-EPiQC-CMU-Duke hidden hidden hidden hidden
4 ZJU_CS_QuLab 141.418 96.218 36.2 9
5 Positive Technology Lab 145.77 98.07 39.2 8.5
5 QuantumLoop hidden hidden hidden hidden
5 Coastal Alliance 146.48 98.08 39.9 8.5

Reviewers: We are appreciate our reviewers: Syed Farhan Ahmad (North Carolina State University, US), Rui Yang (Peking University, CN), Hang Ren (University of California, Bekerley, US), Haowei Deng (University of Maryland College Park, US), Zhirui Hu (George Mason University, US), Jinglei Cheng (Purdue University, US), Jindi Wu (William & Mary, US), Yanzhang Zhu (Northeastern University, US).